Issue 98764 - Check for Updates reports OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 as 3.0
Summary: Check for Updates reports OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 as 3.0
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 95975
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.0.1
Hardware: Mac All
: P5 (lowest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: hans_werner67
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-03 07:26 UTC by Graham Perrin
Modified: 2010-02-09 14:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
screen shot (49.67 KB, image/png)
2009-02-03 07:27 UTC, Graham Perrin 		no flags Details
3.0.1 OOO300m15 (Build:9379) (77.94 KB, image/png)
2009-02-05 14:35 UTC, Graham Perrin 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Graham Perrin 2009-02-03 07:26:48 UTC 
Following installation of 3.0.1, Check for Update reports the installation as 3.0.

Suggestion: within the Check for Update dialogue, the string should either: 

a) always report the exact version

or

b) not report the version (simply state that 'OpenOffice.org is up to date').
Comment 1 Graham Perrin 2009-02-03 07:27:17 UTC 
Created attachment 59840 [details]
screen shot
Comment 2 Joost Andrae 2009-02-03 17:20:48 UTC 
ja->fma: OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 MacOSXIntel build 9379 is added as active release
to product update service as version 3.0.1 and when checking for updates there
should be a new version to be found. Frank, could you please have a look at this ?
Comment 3 hans_werner67 2009-02-03 21:30:59 UTC 
Hi, can you give me a build id of your used version. Thank you very much
Frank
Comment 4 Graham Perrin 2009-02-05 14:35:27 UTC 
Created attachment 59953 [details]
3.0.1  OOO300m15 (Build:9379)
Comment 5 Olaf Felka 2009-08-14 12:55:41 UTC 
This is also true for OOo 3.1.1.
Comment 6 Mechtilde 2010-02-09 14:41:26 UTC 
duplicate of issue 95975

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 95975 ***
Comment 7 Mechtilde 2010-02-09 14:42:38 UTC 
-> closed