Issue 91974 - [cws xmlfilter10] saxon and stax have no license info in their new modules
Summary: [cws xmlfilter10] saxon and stax have no license info in their new modules
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: utilities
Classification: Unclassified
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: DEV300m26
Hardware: Unknown All
: P1 (highest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 3.0
Assignee: hjs
QA Contact: Unknown
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-22 12:50 UTC by rene
Modified: 2008-12-11 18:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description rene 2008-07-22 12:50:07 UTC 
Hi,

as already written per mail: (Paveljanik bogusly wants an issue for this in
extra, so be it)

- stax has no license mentioning at all in the module (CDDL/GPLv2 fwiw)
- saxon has no license mentioning at all in the module

That (at least for saxon) some .java files in the zip tell that it's MPL is not
enough, people who check for licenses will not look deep in tarballs in some
other tarballs.

Please mention the licenses in the READMEs.
Comment 1 pavel 2008-07-22 13:00:21 UTC 
If the module has dual license, please explicitly mention, which license is used/has been approved for 
OOo.
Comment 2 jogi 2008-07-22 13:16:20 UTC 
P1?
Comment 3 svante.schubert 2008-07-22 13:20:08 UTC 
Going to fix this right away..
Comment 4 svante.schubert 2008-07-22 14:15:02 UTC 
After consultation of mh, I have contacted the admin of the StAX site to give an
update of
<https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/source/browse/*checkout*/sjsxp/repo/javax.xml.stream/java-sources/stax-api-1.0-2-sources.jar?rev=1.1.1.1>


To have a license in the source bundle.
Hopefully tomorrow, he is from Japan.
Comment 5 rene 2008-07-23 00:31:31 UTC 
jsi: yes, license problems (especially NEW ones) are P1
Comment 6 svante.schubert 2008-07-23 15:54:03 UTC 
Just an status update, I am mailing to ppl within Sun to add a license to the
source package, but it is not that easy as responsibility was previously in
Japan, now back in states, the time zones delay this task..
Comment 7 svante.schubert 2008-07-24 11:48:31 UTC 
The issues should be resolved now.

StAX:
The StAX source package now contains a LICENSE.html with the dual license of
CDDL 1.0 and GPL v2. This file is now as well in the download package and the
readme was updated with the new package link and explicitly mentioning the usage
of GPL v2 for OOo during build time.

Saxon:
Here as well a LICENSE.html was commited to the download package and the README
file has been updated accordingly.

This issue seems to be resolved now..
Comment 8 svante.schubert 2008-07-24 11:49:24 UTC 
Moved for QA to RE
Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2008-07-24 14:46:16 UTC 
@RE: looks fine for me.
Comment 10 hjs 2008-07-24 16:11:59 UTC 
counts as verified
Comment 11 hjs 2008-12-11 18:09:34 UTC 
.