Issue 8287 - Test of text only browser interface to IZ
Summary: Test of text only browser interface to IZ
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: *Testproduct
Classification: Test
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: not determined
Assignee: issues@www
QA Contact: issues@test
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-13 13:46 UTC by diane
Modified: 2005-07-25 22:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description diane 2002-10-13 13:46:03 UTC 
This issue has been opened only as a test of how OOo website and IZ interface with a user of text-only browzers.  This issue was opened using Lynx (not sure of what version...will add later) running on Linux Redhat 8.0.
Comment 1 diane 2002-12-06 15:27:08 UTC 
This test was performed thru Lynx 2.8.5-7.  My goal was to see if I
could file a bug thru a text-only browser in follow-up of comments
made on an email message sent to the [qa-dev] mail list, 13 Oct 2002,
named "User friendly?".

I was successful at opening the issue.  Although, I found that after
entering each new page, Lynx highlited [logonew.gif] at the very top
of the first page.  Then the arrow keys needed to be used to get to
the bottom of the text where the new page was located.  I responded to
the origninal email message on the [qa-dev] mail list to learn if this
was the same findings the original claim messenger had seen, but there
was no follow-up in that direction.

There was discussion about the web-site interface on the [www-qa]
mailing list in messages with the same name as the original.  And the
issue was originally presented to the [qa-dev] list to show a need for
issue reporting via email.  But neither was part of my original
motivation of opening this issue.  I opened this issue to test whether
 or not an issue could be reported via a text-only browser.  Therefore
I close this issue as works-for-me, assuming it can be reopened if
anyone disagrees.
Comment 2 diane 2002-12-06 15:32:42 UTC 
oops...error in above notes.  the discussion about the web interface
occurred on the [www-dev] mailing list...i spaced thru that typing of
name.
Comment 3 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 09:49:45 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 4 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 09:53:23 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 5 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 10:24:14 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 10:24:41 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.