Issue 7402 - offer OOo versions compiled for different x86 types: AthlonXP, Pentium4
Summary: offer OOo versions compiled for different x86 types: AthlonXP, Pentium4
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: distribution
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: www (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P1 (highest) Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: issues@distribution
QA Contact: issues@distribution
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-08-31 23:03 UTC by lars
Modified: 2003-03-12 14:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lars 2002-08-31 23:03:54 UTC 
is this the appropriate component for this issue?


I noticed that the german Windows OOo download contains a "Intel" in its 
filename.


Could you also offer versions compiled with special x86 cpus in "mind"?

Could you also compile with different memory models (if applicable) and 
optimization switches in mind?



As OpenOffice is not a static product shipping on CD like MsOffice, 
it's "managable" by the user to have to choose the cpu and optimisations.
Comment 1 stx123 2003-02-17 10:13:57 UTC 
Hi Lars,
with the current resources (mainly man power) we are not able to 
provide CPU specific versions.
You may want to raise this to the dev@openoffice.org mailing list.
Greetings, Stefan.
Comment 2 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:24:49 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 3 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:25:17 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 4 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:25:24 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 5 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:42:26 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:42:50 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.
Comment 7 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:42:57 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.