Issue 72106 - variant arrays passed by new ArrayWrapper struct contain wrong type
Summary: variant arrays passed by new ArrayWrapper struct contain wrong type
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: scripting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.2
Assignee: ab
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-29 16:43 UTC by noel.power
Modified: 2007-02-05 13:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
patch (2.29 KB, patch)
2006-11-29 16:45 UTC, noel.power 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description noel.power 2006-11-29 16:43:02 UTC 
variant arrays passed by new ArrayWrapper struct contain the type of the value
rather than variant.
Comment 1 noel.power 2006-11-29 16:44:38 UTC 
when creating new dimensions the code uses the type of the first value ( instead
of the type of the containing sequence ) as the basic value type.
Comment 2 noel.power 2006-11-29 16:45:39 UTC 
Created attachment 40993 [details]
patch
Comment 3 noel.power 2006-11-29 16:54:24 UTC 
fyi ( just in case ye guys might now be using this )
Comment 4 stx123 2006-12-08 12:14:57 UTC 
Greetings Noel, do you plan to integrate this patch in one of your CWSes or
would you like Andreas to have a look at it?
Comment 5 noel.power 2006-12-11 10:19:11 UTC 
>Greetings Noel, do you plan to integrate this patch in one of your CWSes or
>would you like Andreas to have a look at it?

I will integrate this in my next cws, really its just a fyi for Andreas as this
code is afaik currently only used by me
Comment 6 noel.power 2007-01-08 09:57:34 UTC 
.
Comment 7 ab 2007-01-23 09:22:11 UTC 
-> OOo 2.2
Comment 8 ab 2007-01-23 09:26:38 UTC 
-> OOo 2.2, next try
Comment 9 noel.power 2007-01-23 16:48:37 UTC 
fixed
Comment 10 noel.power 2007-01-24 10:23:52 UTC 
over to qa to verify
Comment 11 ab 2007-01-24 13:16:19 UTC 
Verified by code review, anyway only used in vba mode context
Comment 12 Mathias_Bauer 2007-02-05 13:32:25 UTC 
closing ancient issues