Issue 69193 - switch between forms before subform can be used
Summary: switch between forms before subform can be used
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.3
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtop...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-02 13:06 UTC by bvdbos
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
described behaviour in attatched base2.odb (21.27 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.base)
2006-09-02 13:07 UTC, bvdbos
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description bvdbos 2006-09-02 13:06:24 UTC
I have a database with a form and a subform. Both forms contain the same
dataset, the mainform contains a tablegrid and the subform contains the seperate
textfields. There's two actions I want to do: edit a record and add a record.

Edit a record:
If I open the form I first have to click on a record in the tablecontrol and
then switch to the fields to be able to get the save-button to appear. This
means some extra clicks which is not "natural" behaviour. If however I call a
macro with a messagebox from a "button pushed" or "when form loading" event is
seems like the subform is initialized or something like that, after this the
subform works as expected. If omitting the messagebox from the macro, the
behaviour disappears.

Add a record:
Roughly the same steps have to be taken when adding a record. If I simply click
add, I'm not able to enter information in the fields. I first have to click on
the tablegrid then have to click on a field in the subform before I'm able to
add a new record. If however I call the macro with a messagebox first,
everything works as expected.
Comment 1 bvdbos 2006-09-02 13:07:47 UTC
Created attachment 38901 [details]
described behaviour in attatched base2.odb
Comment 2 christoph.lukasiak 2006-09-04 11:03:48 UTC
no bug but feature enhancement

=> send further to the requirements team