Issue 6902 - no support for main entries (alphabetical index) in the xml file format, information ist lost after saving and reopening
Summary: no support for main entries (alphabetical index) in the xml file format, info...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 6836
Alias: None
Product: xml
Classification: Code
Component: definition (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P1 (highest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.0.3
Assignee: eric.savary
QA Contact: issues@xml
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-08-10 10:38 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-03-07 15:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-08-10 10:38:55 UTC 
no support for main entries (alphabetical index) in the xml file format, 
information ist lost after saving and reopening, problem dont occur with the 
old StarWriter5 (sdw) Format. Reproduceable in OO1.0.1 and StarOffice6 de und 
en (pp1).
To reproduce
Mark an entry in doc as main entry ofr alphabetical index, save the doc, close 
OO, reopen the doc and the entry is still there but no longer be marked as 
main entry.
does not happen on same doc with the old sdw Format used form OO 1.0.1, so I 
think the problem is coming out of the file format
Comment 1 michael.brauer 2002-10-10 14:23:40 UTC 
Daniel, sounds like it is yours:)
Comment 2 openoffice 2003-01-07 11:29:54 UTC 
dvo: Duplicate of 9836, me thinks.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 9836 ***
Comment 3 openoffice 2003-01-07 11:31:18 UTC 
dvo: Got the wrong number; sorry. It's really a duplicate of #i6836#
Comment 4 openoffice 2003-01-07 11:35:15 UTC 
.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 6836 ***
Comment 5 openoffice 2003-03-06 18:49:02 UTC 
dvo->es: Fixed some time ago; please test & close in current SRX644
branch.
Comment 6 eric.savary 2003-03-07 15:07:13 UTC 
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 6836 ***
Comment 7 eric.savary 2003-03-07 15:07:35 UTC 
closed