Issue 43922 - Application macro Libraries are missing
Summary: Application macro Libraries are missing
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: scripting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0 Beta
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ab
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-02 16:35 UTC by andrew
Modified: 2005-03-22 14:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description andrew 2005-03-02 16:35:59 UTC
I did a clean install on the OOo 2.0 beta. To do this, I had to manually delete
the Program files and the personal application data directory for the 1.9.79
installation. I also manually cleaned the registry to avoid any residual affects.

Default paths for macros
C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org 1.9.79\share\basic
C:\Documents and Settings\pitonyaka\Application Data\OpenOffice.org1.9.79\user\basic

When this is finished, I do NOT have access to the shared based application
level macros. They are installed and in the correct location, but I can not
access them. They do not show up in the macro organizer and I can not load the
macro libraries and use them. I can go to the command line and modify things in
the directories, I do not have this problem with 1.1.4, and I do not have this
problem on Linux.

Ironically, when I appended them as a read-only link in My macros, they show up
as an application level library. Very strange...
Comment 1 noel.power 2005-03-03 09:13:16 UTC
Andreas to u, also might be an idea to become project owner for this project ;-)
Comment 2 ab 2005-03-03 09:35:49 UTC
Is this reproducable? I often do installations of new StarOffice builds - that
should 
be the same for OpenOffice regarding Library installation - and never had a similar 
problem. And why did you have to do all the cleaning up manually instead of unin-
stalling the office "officially"? This makes the scenario rather difficult to
reproduce. :-)
Comment 3 andrew 2005-03-03 13:27:22 UTC
> Is this reproducable?

This happens EVERY time for me with Windows XP at work.

> I often do installations of new StarOffice builds
> that should be the same for OpenOffice regarding Library installation
> and never had a similar problem. 

This is the first time that I noticed it, but I did not notice it until I
decided to load the "tools" library and it just was not there.

> And why did you have to do all the cleaning up manually instead 
> of uninstalling the office "officially"?
> This makes the scenario rather difficult to reproduce. :-)

Well, I store my user libraries in a non-default location because I do not
really like the default location with windows (even if it does dammage the
configuration files every time that I exit OOo.... I hope the bug is fixed for
2.0.1 :-)) Well, I wanted to make certain that the problem was not related to this. 

1. I uninstalled OOo and then I re-installed. The problem was there. And, it
remembered that I was using my non-default location for libraries.... 

2. I uninstalled OOo, deleted the program directory, and then I re-installed.
The problem was there. And, it remembered that I was using my non-default
location for libraries.... 

3. I uninstalled OOo, deleted the program directory, cleaned the registry,
realized that I had not removed the application data so I removed that, and then
I re-installed. The problem was there. And, it did NOT remembered that I was
using my non-default location for libraries.... 

I just wanted to make certain that it was a completely clean install that had
the problem. The trick is that EVERY install had the problem. I also wanted to
make certain that the problem was NOT my non-standard setup because that would
significantly change the priority of the bug. You know, "Oh, Andy does things
differently, he can wait until 2.0.1" If, however, it has a problem with a
standard setup, then the bug is much more serious. People who do non-default
things are more likely to be able to work around the issues introduced with
their strange setups. Now I know that the problem is not related to what I have
done. 

The important thing, from my perspective, is that when I added a link into "My
own libraries", then they showed up as program level macros. Very strange, but
usable.

I take it that you have not seen this problem with a windows installation.
Comment 4 ab 2005-03-03 13:54:06 UTC
This really sounds strange. What I still don't understand: How do you manage to 
avoid the standard location for user macros? One problem I know about - I think
there's even an issue for it - is that the Basic pathes in Options / Paths are not
really valid any more, because now macrofied URLs are used in the Basic library 
description files. So if you changed anything there...

I also don't use the standard location for user macros but I do it by changing the
location of the complete user installation. This can be done by changing the 
UserInstallation variable in Office/Program/bootstrap.ini. E.g. I always use
UserInstallation=$ORIGIN/../UserInst to locate the User installation inside the
Office directory. So I can remove the complete installation includeing the user 
installation by just deleting one folder which is very nice for developing, where
I have to install a lot of different versions. :-)
Comment 5 andrew 2005-03-04 02:20:50 UTC
>How do you manage to avoid the standard location for user macros? 

I change the "Basic" path under options. Everything works great except that when
you are done it ALWAYS writes the macro configuration to point at the original
location. I listed this as a bug already. It seems silly to me that I can change
these values, but it does not work. Very few people probably do this sort of thing.

>the Basic pathes in Options / Paths are not really valid any more, 

I noticed :-(

> I do it by changing the location of the complete user installation.

I did not know that you could do this..... Perhaps I should do it this way. Of
course, I have determined that the problems that I have are not related to this,
but I am very happy to find out that there is a better way around my particular
issues :-) Thanks for the tip!
Comment 6 ab 2005-03-22 14:09:48 UTC
Options / Paths has to be overworked anyway.
This task can be closed.
Comment 7 ab 2005-03-22 14:13:54 UTC
Closed