Issue 42686 - enum problem with jdk 1.5 in rhino
Summary: enum problem with jdk 1.5 in rhino
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m77
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: ab
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-13 16:17 UTC by isah
Modified: 2005-05-24 13:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
replaces variable "enum" by "myEnum" in rhino/ScriptRuntime.java for jdk1.5 compatibility (504 bytes, patch)
2005-02-13 16:18 UTC, isah 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description isah 2005-02-13 16:17:17 UTC 
JDK 1.5 does not support "enum" as variable name anymore. Name of the variable
changed accordingly in rhino/ScriptRuntime.java.
Comment 1 isah 2005-02-13 16:18:18 UTC 
Created attachment 22560 [details]
replaces variable "enum" by "myEnum" in rhino/ScriptRuntime.java for jdk1.5 compatibility
Comment 2 Olaf Felka 2005-02-14 09:00:32 UTC 
@ mh: Something for you?
Comment 3 Martin Hollmichel 2005-03-09 16:27:37 UTC 
is this now your area ?
Comment 4 ab 2005-03-14 10:47:23 UTC 
-> Started, -> OOo 2.0.1
Comment 5 ab 2005-03-14 15:01:46 UTC 
Fixed
Comment 6 ab 2005-03-14 16:06:50 UTC 
Reopen due to unexpected build problems using the new patch file under Linux
Comment 7 ab 2005-03-16 12:02:29 UTC 
ab->hjs: As discussed...
Comment 8 hjs 2005-04-13 15:43:29 UTC 
renamed variable
Comment 9 hjs 2005-04-13 15:45:09 UTC 
please verify

re-open issue and reassign to ab@openoffice.org
Comment 10 hjs 2005-04-13 15:45:13 UTC 
reassign to ab@openoffice.org
Comment 11 hjs 2005-04-13 15:45:18 UTC 
reset resolution to FIXED
Comment 12 ab 2005-04-15 10:15:36 UTC 
Built in m93, "enum" changed to "myEnum" -> Verified
Comment 13 thorsten.ziehm 2005-05-09 15:26:27 UTC 
This task is integrated in m97. This means the target 2.0.1 isn't correctly. =>
target set back to 2.0.
Comment 14 ab 2005-05-24 13:13:32 UTC 
Closed