Issue 41865 - m76 shows 8 core rpms/packages and installs only Base
Summary: m76 shows 8 core rpms/packages and installs only Base
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All Linux, all
: P1 (highest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: eric.savary
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-02 06:39 UTC by eric.savary
Modified: 2005-02-02 09:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description eric.savary 2005-02-02 06:39:21 UTC 
The src680m76 (all Linux and Solaris sets) shows 8 core rpm/packages.
This is was not planed and breaks UserLand scripts (OOo starts but only the Base
component seems to be there)
Comment 1 eric.savary 2005-02-02 06:50:16 UTC 
Note: Windows build looks corrupt too. Nothing special looking at the install
files and all components are there in the File menu but opening any new apps
document shows an empty window with some mixed toolbars at the top of the min
window.

I keep this report on "Linux" for it is there abvously a build/package problem.
Comment 2 eric.savary 2005-02-02 06:51:37 UTC 
Note: Windows build looks corrupt too. Nothing special looking at the install
files and all components are there in the File menu but opening any new apps
document shows an empty window with some mixed toolbars at the top of the min
window.

I keep this report on "Linux" for it is there abvously a build/package problem.
Comment 3 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2005-02-02 09:07:11 UTC 
Please use a userland script for a src680m76. Then this problem will not occur.
Comment 4 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2005-02-02 09:08:56 UTC 
userland scripts based on src680m76 allow a complete installation.
For the problems with empty windows and mixed toolbars please write a new task
(not for me :-) )
Comment 5 eric.savary 2005-02-02 09:27:41 UTC 
You're right.