Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 28351
Accept or Reject Changes: Formats cannot be rejected
Last modified: 2013-02-07 22:41:29 UTC
When working with recorded changes (menu Edit - Changes - Accept or Reject) you cannot reject "Formats" changes. Selecting a Formats-change (e.g making some text bold) together with other changes (e.g. Insertion) you can click "Reject" -> the Formats change is removed from the list and the colored highlighting is removed also but the change is still present (=text is still bold). The same happens when clicking "Reject all": the list is cleared, all colored highlights in the text are removed but the formatting isn't changed back. Tracking changes of formats doesn't make sense if you can only accept them and if they aren't reverted when rejected.
TM->HI: Not a framework issue. Please have a look.
I've seen the same problem in 1.9.m47. I can change a format parameter (font size, text color, etc), and it shows up as a change, but if I select that change in the dialog box, the "Reject" button is grayed out. I agree with the originator that tracking format changes is not very useful if they can't be rejected.
A good thing for the next redlining changes in OO 3.0. As long as the big competitor does allow this, we should also do...
still broke in 1.9.84
This problem is still present in version 3.2.0. auberger and joeclarkia said that tracking format changes is not very useful if they can't be rejected. I hope that nobody takes this to mean that it would be better not to track format changes. It is good to be able to see what format changes have been made, although of course it would be _very_ good to also be able to undo them. Shortly after this issue was first reported, tm said that it was not a framework issue, but it is still labelled that way. I don't understand the system enough to know what component it should be, nor whether it matters. Does anyone know whether this would actually be a difficult thing to fix?
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on my owner to the owner "requirements".
*** Issue 115277 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
.