Issue 12157 - Problems with Formula in Brasilian Version
Summary: Problems with Formula in Brasilian Version
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Math
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.1
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P1 (highest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: issues@sw
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-09 01:45 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-03-09 01:45:10 UTC 
Hi! OpenOffice is a great office software! Congratulations and thanks a lot!

Well, I´ve been used the Brasilian OO for four months under linux (Conectiva 
8), win98 and Win2000pro, and the only problem I´ve noted is about using greek 
characters in formula editor. While the original version (US English) uses 
"%omega" and "%alpha" for those characters, the Brasilian uses "%ômega" and "%
alfa". Sometimes, when you save the document (writer) and reopen it, the 
character "%ômega", for exemple, is not shown. What is displayed is "omegaa". 
About the "%alfa", it is displayed as "alfaa".
Well, I think that a pattern should be taken for all distributions (I´d suggest 
the US version), as well among their languages, making the documents containing 
formulas compatible for all OpenOffice versions.

Thanks a lot for the software and for the possibility of making it better.

    [Rodrigo Oliveira] - Brazil
Comment 1 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-05-14 07:28:26 UTC 
We have a DUP of this bug:
issue 12158
Comment 2 jensja 2003-05-21 22:24:35 UTC 
Marked as duplicate. Thanks Rainer. Obviously a copy of 1258.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 1258 ***
Comment 3 jensja 2003-05-22 20:19:03 UTC 
Sorry I was too fast when I typed in the duplicate number. 
Reopening just to mark it as duplicate of 12158!
Comment 4 jensja 2003-05-22 20:21:38 UTC 
Here is the correct duplicate id. 
closing once again.


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 12158 ***
Comment 5 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-08-09 08:49:53 UTC 
to labels as INVALID
Comment 6 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-08-09 08:50:22 UTC 
Double submit of 12158
Comment 7 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-08-09 08:51:02 UTC 
so INVALID
Comment 8 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-08-09 08:51:16 UTC 
.