Issue 91974

Summary:	[cws xmlfilter10] saxon and stax have no license info in their new modules
Product:	utilities	Reporter:	rene
Component:	code	Assignee:	hjs <hans-joachim.lankenau>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	Unknown <non-migrated>
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P1 (highest)	CC:	issues, nesshof, pavel
Version:	DEV300m26
Target Milestone:	OOo 3.0
Hardware:	Unknown
OS:	All
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---

Description rene 2008-07-22 12:50:07 UTC

Hi,

as already written per mail: (Paveljanik bogusly wants an issue for this in
extra, so be it)

- stax has no license mentioning at all in the module (CDDL/GPLv2 fwiw)
- saxon has no license mentioning at all in the module

That (at least for saxon) some .java files in the zip tell that it's MPL is not
enough, people who check for licenses will not look deep in tarballs in some
other tarballs.

Please mention the licenses in the READMEs.

Comment 1 pavel 2008-07-22 13:00:21 UTC

If the module has dual license, please explicitly mention, which license is used/has been approved for 
OOo.

Comment 2 jogi 2008-07-22 13:16:20 UTC

P1?

Comment 3 svante.schubert 2008-07-22 13:20:08 UTC

Going to fix this right away..

Comment 4 svante.schubert 2008-07-22 14:15:02 UTC

After consultation of mh, I have contacted the admin of the StAX site to give an
update of
<https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/source/browse/*checkout*/sjsxp/repo/javax.xml.stream/java-sources/stax-api-1.0-2-sources.jar?rev=1.1.1.1>


To have a license in the source bundle.
Hopefully tomorrow, he is from Japan.

Comment 5 rene 2008-07-23 00:31:31 UTC

jsi: yes, license problems (especially NEW ones) are P1

Comment 6 svante.schubert 2008-07-23 15:54:03 UTC

Just an status update, I am mailing to ppl within Sun to add a license to the
source package, but it is not that easy as responsibility was previously in
Japan, now back in states, the time zones delay this task..

Comment 7 svante.schubert 2008-07-24 11:48:31 UTC

The issues should be resolved now.

StAX:
The StAX source package now contains a LICENSE.html with the dual license of
CDDL 1.0 and GPL v2. This file is now as well in the download package and the
readme was updated with the new package link and explicitly mentioning the usage
of GPL v2 for OOo during build time.

Saxon:
Here as well a LICENSE.html was commited to the download package and the README
file has been updated accordingly.

This issue seems to be resolved now..

Comment 8 svante.schubert 2008-07-24 11:49:24 UTC

Moved for QA to RE

Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2008-07-24 14:46:16 UTC

@RE: looks fine for me.

Comment 10 hjs 2008-07-24 16:11:59 UTC

counts as verified

Comment 11 hjs 2008-12-11 18:09:34 UTC