Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | to-be-DEV300_m2: svtools/source/uno/genericunodialog.cxx | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Build Tools | Reporter: | pavel | ||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | Frank Schönheit <frank.schoenheit> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@tools <issues> | ||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||
Priority: | P1 (highest) | CC: | frank.schoenheit, issues, ruediger.timm | ||||
Version: | OOo 1.0.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | OOo 3.0 | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Issue Type: | PATCH | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
pavel
2008-03-08 16:23:11 UTC
Another problem: /home/oo/BuildDir/ooo_DEV300_m2_src/extensions/source/propctrlr/MasterDetailLinkDialog.cxx:125: error: 'm_xContext' was not declared in this scope Similar: /home/oo/BuildDir/ooo_DEV300_m2_src/chart2/source/controller/dialogs/dlg_ChartType_UNO.cxx:125: error: 'm_xContext' was not declared in this scope Bad conincidence. CWS rptchart01 introduced a member m_xContext in OGenericUnoDialog, CWS odbmacros2 moved the header file to from svtools/inc to svtools/inc/svtools. Isn't it that intgration should have caught this? Be it. The straight-forward solution would be to merge the changes 1.8->1.9 from svtools/inc/genericunodialog.hxx to svtools/inc/svtools/genericunodialog.cxx. Going to attach a patch, and to write an issue which addresses the problem I have with this new member (which is why I said "straight-forward" - there could be another patch which would also address this problem ...) Created attachment 51992 [details]
proper patch
fs->kz: please assign the attached patch, it should fix the problem. for the record: issze 86850 is for cleaning up the m_xContext thingie. reassign to mysef fixed @ ->fs: verify, please found fix in svtools/inc/svtools/genericunodialog.hxx integrated on HEAD. yes, closing. *** Issue 86835 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** *** Issue 86836 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** |